| Never mind the vicious nonsense of claiming that
an embryo has a 'right to life.' A piece of protoplasm has no rights—and
no life in the human sense of the term. One may argue about the
later stages of a pregnancy, but the essential issue concerns only
the first three months. To equate a potential with an
actual, is vicious; to advocate the sacrifice of the latter
to the former, is unspeakable. |
|
— Ayn Rand
|

Hundreds of students over the past few months have been asking for further
resources to help them on this controversial topic. Listed below are a few
tips to help you write a class paper, or to help you further understand
the nature of the issue.
How to use this site
The first thing I recommend you do to study this issue is to carefully listen
to Dr. Peikoff's
real audio lecture
on why abortion is pro-life. This will require
Real Audio's free Real Player
plug in. I would listen to this about 10 times, or so over several days,
as there is so much information condensed into this brief lecture.
The second thing I recommend is that they read the
essays on the essay page. These essays will have much of the
information you are looking for and they may be used as sited references
for papers. The citations may reference either Capitalism Magazine, or the
Ayn Rand Institute's Media Link.
The third thing I recommend is that they read through all of the
questions and answers in the question and answer
section.
Grasping the essence of the abortion issue
The two key issues to focus on are: the nature of a fetus, and the nature
of individual rights.
The first issue to grasp is the difference between
potential and actual. A fetus is not an actual human being,
but is human tissue. A fetus is only a potential human
being, just like an acorn is a potential oak tree. That a fetus is
potential human being, does not make it an actual one. Once
you grasp this point, you need to grasp a much more complex point — which
is not self-evident — about the nature of rights.
The second issue to grasp is that
rights only apply
to actual human beings. Rights only apply to human beings;
they apply to human beings because man survives by reason. Men do
not survive — at least for long — like animals do in the jungle. Rather
then hunting for food like an animal, man grows it. He builds houses to
protect himself from hurricanes and storms. He creates clothing to keep
warm. He discovers drugs to kill bacteria that may cause him harm. He manufactures
refrigerators to keep his food fresh. This is why man has rights — and animals
do not — to leave his mind free to think, and his body free to act on that
thinking. As a fetus does not use reason to survive; but, rather it survives
on the sustenance provided by the body of its' host, a fetus has no rights,
and no need for rights. A fetus has no right to life, liberty, property.
The key issue in this context is that a fetus has no right to be inside
the body of another human being, because no such right exists. Yet, this
is the only kind of 'right' it requires to exist. To grant the fetus
such a right, would make its host — the pregnant mother — a slave. Slavery
is not a right.
This in essence is the case for a woman's moral right to
abortion: a fetus is not an actual human being, but is only human
tissue inside the body of an actual human being. Rights only
apply to actual human beings (whether a new born child, or a hundred year
old grandfather, or a pregnant woman), as they require freedom to act by
the use of their mind.
Books and Tapes
Objectivism: The
Philosophy of Ayn Rand
by Leonard Peikoff
To help you further explore the philosophical
issues concerning abortion, I recommend Leonard Peikoff's
Objectivism: The
Philosophy of Ayn Rand. The key sections to study in this book are
pages 351-363 on individual rights as absolutes, and pages 357-359 on their
application to abortion. Every good library carries this book — especially
college libraries, if not be sure to ask your librarian to carry it, or
purchase it online.
The Right to Abortion
by Andrew Bernstein, Ph.D.
This talk is an unequivocal defense—on philosophic grounds—of the moral
right to abortion.
He reveals the errors in the scientific arguments of anti-abortionists;
the failure to recognize the biological nature of the fetus; the equivocation
on key terms; and the obliteration of the distinction between the actual
and the potential. More broadly, he upholds the principle of individual
rights, and contrasts it with the theory of self-sacrifice espoused by the
anti-abortionists. This hard-hitting talk will unsettle both conservatives
and liberals.
A Picture is Not an Argument
by Leonard Peikoff
More and more in today's culture, people — on behalf of causes ranging
from anti-abortion to anti-war — are trying to defend some viewpoint not
by words but by pictures. This lecture indicates why presenting visually
shocking pictures is an epistemologically invalid, anti-conceptual
method of presenting an issue.
Of Living Death by Ayn Rand
Also worth reading is Ayn Rand' 1968 Ford Hall Forum lecture on the
papal encyclical Humanae Vitae, titled Of Living Death published
in
The Voice of Reason: Essays in Objectivist Thought by Ayn Rand.
Also see the article Man's Rights published in
Capitalism : The Unknown Ideal.
|
|